Kabinet američkog predsjednika Joea Bidena trebao bi se pred kraj mandata suzdržati od uvođenja propisa koji predviđa kontrolu nad pristupom svijeta čipovima za umjetnu inteligenciju jer bi mogli ugroziti i vodeću ulogu SAD-a u tom sektoru, upozorila je […] Objava Vijeće tehnoloških divova: Kontrola pristupa čipovima za AI mač s dvije oštrice pojavila se prvi puta na Novi list.
The main conceptual idea of the article is that a proposed new regulation by the US government which aims to control access to AI chips by designating certain companies as "guardians" could harm the US's leading position in the AI sector.
Here's a breakdown:
* The US government wants to restrict access to AI chips for certain countries, particularly China, while granting preferential access to its allies. This is being done under the guise of national security.
* However, a group of tech giants, represented by the ITI, warns against the proposed regulation. They argue that it could stifle innovation and give other countries an advantage in the field of AI.
* The regulation would require companies like Google and Microsoft to share sensitive information with the government and block Chinese access to AI chips. This, ITI believes, would be detrimental to the US tech industry and its global competitiveness.
Essentially, the article presents a debate between national security concerns and the potential downsides of regulation for innovation and global leadership in AI.
The main conceptual idea of the article is that a proposed new regulation by the US government which aims to control access to AI chips by designating certain companies as "guardians" could harm the US's leading position in the AI sector. Here's a breakdown: * The US government wants to restrict access to AI chips for certain countries, particularly China, while granting preferential access to its allies. This is being done under the guise of national security. * However, a group of tech giants, represented by the ITI, warns against the proposed regulation. They argue that it could stifle innovation and give other countries an advantage in the field of AI. * The regulation would require companies like Google and Microsoft to share sensitive information with the government and block Chinese access to AI chips. This, ITI believes, would be detrimental to the US tech industry and its global competitiveness. Essentially, the article presents a debate between national security concerns and the potential downsides of regulation for innovation and global leadership in AI.
